Cops Capture Campers!


Climate Change is an issue that’s affecting us all (whether we acknowledge it or not) and one about which we should all, rightly, be concerned.
Increasingly we are seeing the effects of climate change impacting peoples’ lives all over the world and, unless something dramatic is done, this situation will only get worse. Nor is this something that we can afford to simply put on the back burner for future generations to deal with.

Ultimately it may prove that to alleviate the more serious effects of climate change the measures that have so far been introduced in terms of reducing carbon emissions, “saving energy” and seeking alternative energy sources etc are insufficient… too little, too late.
The measures that government and the corporate world are introducing, or have planned to introduce, are neither enough or go far enough (or even quickly enough), and in some cases may actually be counter-productive by creating worse problems than they’re intended to solve (one classic example being the development of “biofuels”). There is also a very real concern that climate change issues are simply being used as another angle to generate yet more massive profits for “big business” (and by the political parties purely to gain popular support) with little genuine interest in what’s really at stake.

In reality our current lifestyle, certainly in the “developed world”, is likely to prove unsustainable and we shall all be forced into a far-reaching reappraisal.
Of course, this is not a “popular” message for politicians to have to convey, nor is there much prospect in it of endlessly increasing profits for the commercial world. A return to a simpler, more sustainable and less energy-intensive lifestyle would almost certainly impact the world economy in an unprecedented manner and therefore, for the “movers and shakers”, is a message to be avoided at any cost.
So it may prove that the initiative for real change will have to come from the grassroots level, with the ordinary general public driving forward demands to tackle climate change as a matter of extreme urgency.

And indeed this is already happening with initiatives such as the Camp for Climate Action (aka Climate Camp).

Climate Camp is an event organised by ordinary people at an extreme grassroots level that has occurred for the past two years and provides a space (for about a week or so) where people can come together and experience sustainable living for themselves, learning more about the issues involved, skill-sharing, and participating in activities that help to increase awareness amongst the population at large of the issues surrounding climate change.

In 2006 the first Climate Camp was located near Drax in Yorkshire, the largest coal-fired power station in the UK. 2007, and Climate Camp was to be found near Heathrow, where there are plans afoot to ravage an entire swathe of countryside and displace local communities to expand the runways, opening the way for ever more pollution-producing flights.

And its just been announced (last Monday, 3rd March) that this year’s Climate Camp will be at Kingsnorth in Kent, site of a proposed new coal-fired power station.

The Climate Camp itself (finding the space and creating the infrastructure of a large campsite to support hundreds of “Campers” for just over a week or so) is a tremendous undertaking in terms of planning, organisation, and actually “making it happen”… given that its an entirely volunteer effort with no corporate or institutional support. The entire event relies exclusively on ordinary people from vastly different backgrounds and viewpoints working together over a considerable period. The fact that it happens at all is little short of a miracle, and a huge testament to what is achievable when folk put their minds to it.

The first Camp saw 600+ people converging on a field in Yorkshire, the second witnessed well over double that number at a campsite established near Heathrow airport.

A significant amount of planning and prior preparation (and indeed the continual need to find “accords” and “compromises” that must inevitably occur when large numbers of people, each with their own particular viewpoint and way of doing things, come together to achieve a common objective within a non-hierarchical framework) obviously occur in the months leading up to the Camp itself.

Weekend-long meetings (or “gatherings” to use the terminology of the Campers) are hosted at different venues throughout the country, from as far afield as Scotland to the South of England, on a monthly cycle where everyone’s welcome to attend and participate in the process of making the Camp happen. And of course all the relevant details of these gatherings (time, date, venue etc) are published beforehand.

The first one I managed to attend this year was at the SUMAC centre in Nottingham which, coincidentally, was the gathering at which the Kingsnorth location for the Camp proved to be the concensus.

However, for me something of a sour note crept into this most recent gathering in the shape of the presence of a police surveillance team!
I can’t speak of the previous gatherings this year, but certainly I’d not noticed such a presence at any of the gatherings of the past two years (of which I attended quite a few), and I find this escalation of police monitoring of public assemblies to be quite disturbing in its implications.

In this post I’ve deliberately spent some time providing a context for these gatherings… they’re the manifestation of the extreme concern felt by large numbers of ordinary people about an issue of fundamental importance to society as a whole. They’re also a positive manifestaton of the preparedness of ordinary members of the public to acknowledge a personal responsibility to act when government fails to perform, and when the corporate world places profit above more pressing needs.
These gatherings are public; they are announced beforehand; they are peaceful, they are legal. They’re well-structured and represent no threat to public order or safety.

Why then the monitoring thereof by police camera teams? And indeed does such monitoring even fall within the remit of the police force?

The first meeting of the weekend started at 1100 on the Saturday (1st March). I arrived (in company of a friend) a few minutes late and immediately observed three uniformed police officers (one of whom was equipped with a camera) loitering outside the front entrance of the SUMAC centre.
Whilst they made no attempt to prevent us entering the centre we were photographed as we approached (note… even before we’d actually entered the premises!).
Conferring with some of the people inside we learned that the police had been present before the announced start time of the first meeting, obviously with the intent of photographing everyone attending. (This raises the interesting question of how, and whether, they would differentiate between those attending the Climate Camp gathering and those visiting SUMAC for purely social purposes?)

IMG_4427 IMG_4432 IMG_4430

At some stage during the course of the day that particular team disappeared. However, when the gathering adjourned for lunch on the Saturday I observed another couple of police (one of whom was equipped with a camera) in an unmarked car parked outside the rear entrance to the centre, again photographing the comings and goings therefrom.
When approached and challenged they denied they were acting in a “covert” manner… clearly forgetting the fact that they were in an unmarked car!


It seems to me that the presence of such police surveillance at public assemblies etc is becoming far more prevalent, and it appears to be almost standard practise now at virtually any demonstration or protest where the policies of the government of the day are being challenged or questioned.
I’m not entirely certain that this is acceptable. As I’m not entirely certain that any legitimate “law & order” interest is being served thereby. It seems to me rather that it is some sort of political agenda that is being served, and the deployment of police resources in such manner is far too redolent of the sort of activity that one would expect to find in a fascist or “police state”.

Serious questions need to be asked. Such as, for example, what is the intended use of such photographs? Is it to build up profiles of individuals, their movements, their friends and contacts? And why? As some sort of “evidence” in the event that such people may, at some indeterminate point in the future, possibly participate in an as yet undefined “illegal act”?
Or is it to compile a database of people that may be likely to resist the introduction of some unpopular legislation in the future, or may oppose some future government policy?

Ok, call me paranoid if you wish, but think on this… what if such a “surveillance database” were integrated with the database that will inevitably be created from the ID card scheme that the government is still determined to introduce, albeit by the back door?
Its not too difficult to visualise a situation where, at some point in the not-too-distant future, ID card-related benefits (education, health, welfare, housing, travel etc) will be withheld if you just happen to associate with the wrong people, or just happen to go to the wrong meeting.

This is all just one step too close to the thought police as far as I’m concerned.

Article also posted at:

Fitwatch at Tilting at Windmills

About fotdmike

Occasional photographer; occasional writer/blogger; occasional activist; occasional computer-geek. Bit of a fool really.
This entry was posted in Issues, Photography Chat and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Cops Capture Campers!

  1. forkboy1965 says:

    Here in the States we had similar situations whenever there were anti-war marches or protests (excuse me…”demos” for you). Not only were the local police involved, but also the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and rumors that members of the military were also in attendance to take pictures and/or video. Many, including myself, were very concerned about the taking of pictures and video of peaceful and lawful marches. One likes to believe that the intent of the authorities is legitimate; maybe to record folks because they know some may be bent towards illegal activities. But the temptation for our government and other authorities to misuse this sort of data is overwhelming. History has shown us, time and time again, that monitoring of the populace always leads to infringement of civil liberties.

  2. fotdmike says:

    Yeah, its an increasingly prevalent trend over here too. And the “evidence gathering” explanation simply won’t stand up for there are technologies available that allow for far less intrusive/provocative ways of doing that.
    So what we’re left with is the “deterrence” explanation (tacitly admitted by the Essex police force in a publication of theirs a while ago) which, when stretched a bit, can easily turn into intimidation.
    So much of a concern has this issue become to the activist community over here that a group has sprung into being over here with the specific objective of exposing/opposing this particular police tactic. Call themselves “fitwatch” and they can be found at

    “Watching the watchers” is also an area that I tend to specialise in a bit meself, particularly as it relates to my “news gatherer” role.

  3. forkboy1965 says:

    Yes, I have noticed that. And I’ve looked over some of the fitwatch pictures you have taken. So the spies are being spied upon.

    Back when I lived in Chicago I was unlucky enough to live in a somewhat rough neighborhood. One sunny summer afternoon the local constabulary had pulled over in front of my flat a vehicle filled with young men. I noted the officers were cuffing the young men and conducting a search of the vehicle so I grabbed my camera and headed outside to record the event.

    Very shortly after arriving upon the scene one officer strongly suggested (i.e. yelled in a threatening manner) I take myself and my camera elsewhere. I ignored him and continued taking pictures. After all, I was standing on my property, was no where near the car or in any way interfering with the arrest and vehicle search (I was probably 40 feet or so away from them).

    After seeing that I wasn’t moving along he took a few steps towards me and threatened to arrest me if I didn’t ‘move along’. I should have told him to piss off as I was within my legal rights to stand on my property and use my camera to record the event as it transpired.

    Something happens to men and women when they put on a uniform. It’s as if their brain switches off and they become assholes. Not all, of course and not all the time, but no small amount of attitude seems to come with the job.

    Why can’t they all be like DCI Tennison?

  4. fotdmike says:

    You’re absolutely spot on. We get the same sort of thing happening over here (and inevitably “fitwatchers” tend to receive more than most of it).
    Yet the cops really don’t like photos being taken of themselves. Pity they don’t stop to think about the obvious corollary when they’re weilding their cameras.

    Or perhaps they do… !

  5. forkboy1965 says:

    No, I don’t think they do. I believe that they think they are doing their job, while they think we (or really you in this instance) are up to something. When you get down to it, who is usually “up to something”? The average citizen or our respective governments?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s